Decision record
Separates decisions, open questions, objections, and commitments instead of flattening the meeting into a generic summary.
VideoLens reviews meeting video and audio for decisions, objections, commitments, and follow-ups, then anchors the report to the timestamps where those moments occurred.
Meeting summaries are most useful when a teammate can verify what was decided and why. VideoLens combines the transcript with visible presentation context and produces evidence-linked findings instead of a memory-based recap.
Use Meeting mode for a structured review, or ask a narrower question about a customer objection, pricing discussion, unresolved decision, or owner commitment.
Separates decisions, open questions, objections, and commitments instead of flattening the meeting into a generic summary.
Citations let owners verify the precise discussion behind an action item.
Sampled frames can capture slides, shared screens, and other visible context that a transcript omits.
Every stage is explicit and cached so the source can be checked and the analysis can be reused.
It can use diarized transcription when available, but speaker attribution quality depends on the audio and transcription output. Human verification is recommended.
Yes. Use a focused prompt, such as asking for every pricing objection or the evidence behind a specific decision.
The open-source workflow runs locally. The hosted app uses ephemeral session processing and your OpenAI key; VideoLens does not build a retained meeting dataset.
Try the hosted app, self-host the MIT-licensed core, or connect VideoLens to an MCP client.